How many is “not a few”?
November 12th, 2008, by Andrew
In a discussion of the historic nature of Barack Obama’s election, Christopher Hitchens writes, “there were not a few elected black American representatives 40 years ago.”
This claim surprised me, so I looked it up. In 1968, there were 5 African Americans in the House of Representatives and 1 in the Senate. This sounds like only “a few” to me! Was Hitchens just confused here, or am I missing something?
P.S. Somebody pointed out that there were black state and local officeholders as well. I guess it all turns on what is meant by “not a few.” Blacks were certainly a very low percentage of all U.S. elected officials back then.
Similar Posts:
- Race, region, and Obama
- Cool historical maps
- Left-right ideology of voters, congressmembers, and senators
- What happened in the Congressional vote?
- More on the swing in the House vote
Entry Filed under: Elections
2 Comments
Add your own1. James Duff | November 13th, 2008 at 6:36 am
“Not a few”. Since a few, “to most people”, means several. “Not a few” well, that would mean less than several. What it really means, “is not fucking many”.
2. Pat | November 17th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
“Not a few” is meaningless. “Not a few” says nothing about the actual value, just like “not 3″ could mean an infinite number of values except for 3.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed