<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balancing and Partisan Tides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/2008/12/balancing-and-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/2008/12/balancing-and-party/</link>
	<description>Why Americans Vote the Way they Do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/2008/12/balancing-and-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/?p=322#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>What kind of misconceptions about political  ideologies iterfere with our democracy? Like beleiving in only republican or democratic, and what would make one think that way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of misconceptions about political  ideologies iterfere with our democracy? Like beleiving in only republican or democratic, and what would make one think that way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/2008/12/balancing-and-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/?p=322#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>I believe in balancing; I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary to explain the result.  The Republican won the first round of the election, then in the 2nd round a conservative third party candidate dropped out and there was an expected drop in turnout (which I would also think would favor more conservative candidates, but maybe I&#039;m wrong on that point).  It seemed a leap to bring in balancing as an explanation without first going through these big factors.

Regarding by-elections:  yes, but I think these are typically considered to be important as a lead-in to future elections, not when they are a month after the general election and before the newly elected candidates have even started their jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in balancing; I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessary to explain the result.  The Republican won the first round of the election, then in the 2nd round a conservative third party candidate dropped out and there was an expected drop in turnout (which I would also think would favor more conservative candidates, but maybe I&#8217;m wrong on that point).  It seemed a leap to bring in balancing as an explanation without first going through these big factors.</p>
<p>Regarding by-elections:  yes, but I think these are typically considered to be important as a lead-in to future elections, not when they are a month after the general election and before the newly elected candidates have even started their jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

